Our world is being socially shaped into a socially engineered version of humanity and for too many of us these influences remain utterly obscure!
One reason for the obscurity in all of this is that these influences have been fractionally and methodically introduced over a breadth of time that has spanned generations. The decadal effects are slow and the societal change over generations is not a rapid change.
Thus, because of the slow speed in change, change is not often met with great controversy. As cultural conflicts in America are unique to the evolving American cultural experiment and conflict has always been the precursor to change.
This so called tweaking, pushing and prodding has taken place in many forms but, they are purposefully all in play in order to accomplish the task at hand, which is called in our modern era, PRIMING.
Although intended to redirect society over generations, what we should be able to recognize during the previous two generations is how society is being outfitted with a completely new wardrobe that is tailor made and fitted to accomplish a specific fit to a specific kind of figure.
Basically, the introduction of these obtuse social dynamics are focused upon one specific task at hand and this task is specifically population control. Keeping in mind that population control isn’t just about the slowing of the world’s birthrate but, how each sector of that growth rate will also be redistributed over the worlds population as representatives of a new and evolving world culture.
In dissecting the world’s evolving culture, we can observe great efforts being employed that are no doubt focused upon making changes, correct?
These changes are directed at how we view the evolving world and the influences being put to work can be seen clearly as dividing society up into several distinct categories i.e.:
- Gender or sexual orientation
- other divisions
I use the word “divisions” here because in dividing society up into pieces it makes society more easily controlled and governed by a consensus or committee, especially when changes take place spanning generations. Realize that Divide and rule, in politics, sociology, and economics is an age old strategy to gain or maintain power!
In today’s technological advancing computer science world, “divide and conquer (D & C) is an algorithm design paradigm based on multi-branched recursion. A divide and conquer algorithm works by recursively breaking down a problem into two or more sub-problems of the same or related type, until these become simple enough to be solved directly. The solutions to the sub-problems are then combined to give a solution to the original problem. Understanding and designing D & C algorithms is a complex skill that requires a good understanding of the nature of the underlying problem to be solved.”
There are many factors that contribute to meeting the objective of population control. What may have been controversial in the days gone by in previous generations, is now being promoted (PRIMED) in every visual and audio spectrum available to mankind. The propagation of this new world face is really very much like an updated 2.0 version to a 4.0 version of our human profile.
In such a span of time, changes are much more easily attributed to the changing of the guard or the old ways changing to the new way version, kind of like an updated software,…hum? The source of such influences or updates are fractionally introduced and can escape even the most observant but, I’m going to impose upon you to employ a greater appreciation for your observational awareness and see if you are intrigued by what is clearly the evolving “ALPHA” human!
The Alpha Male…
Most everyone has heard of the Alpha Male i.e., An alpha male has certain unmistakable characteristics. A natural leader, he is a pack-builder. He leads, provides for and protects his pack (his significant other, his buddies, his teammates, and so on). The changing world presents a continuing opportunity for an alpha male.
The Alpha Female..
Yet not everyone has heard of the Alpha Female i.e.,The Alpha Female is a strong, majestic female. She can often be intimidating to those around her and isn’t afraid to ask for what she wants. She’s killing it in her career and has a solid group of friends to rely on. There’s nothing quite as brilliant as a woman with confidence and ambition.
We have always had both Alpha Males and Alpha Females but the societal roles had historically differed from one another. Today’s portrayals of each have been “PRIMED” to be in competition for only one alpha role model. This change is successfully furthering the distance of division between the alpha males historical dominance over past society’s structure and redefining how our future society will respond and ultimately appear.
The Effects of Change…
“Charles Darwin long ago noticed the existence of intra-sexual competition between males; he also understood that the basic aim of all this male mayhem was to gain the attention and reproductive favor of females.”
“According to Joyce Benenson, a researcher at Emmanuel College in Boston, competition among women has three unique characteristics: first, because they have to protect their bodies from physical harm (so as not to interfere with present or future pregnancy and childbirth), women rely on veiled aggression towards other women (behind verbal gymnastics or under cover of the group) rather than physical confrontation.
Second, high status and very attractive women need less help and protection from other women and are less motivated to invest in other women (who represent potential competition). Thus, a woman who tries to distinguish or promote herself threatens other women and will encounter hostility. According to Benenson, a common way women deal with the threat represented by a remarkably powerful or beautiful woman is by insisting on standards of equality, uniformity, and sharing for all the women in the group and making these attributes the normative requirements of proper femininity.
Third, in extreme cases women may guard against potential competitors by means of social exclusion. If a new attractive woman shows up in the neighborhood (or school, or club), all the women in attendance may turn their backs on her, compelling her to withdraw from the scene, thus increasing their own chances with the surrounding males.
Recent research suggests that the contraceptive pill—which prevents women from ovulating by fooling their body into believing it is pregnant could affect which types of men women desire. Going on or off the pill during a relationship, therefore, may tempt a woman away from her man.
It’s all about scent. Hidden in a man’s smell are clues about his major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes, which play an important role in immune system surveillance. Studies suggest that females prefer the scent of males whose MHC genes differ from their own, a preference that has probably evolved because it helps offspring survive: couples with different MHC genes are less likely to be related to each other than couples with similar genes are, and their children are born with more varied MHC profiles and thus more robust immune systems.
Prescribed Attraction and Detraction…
Women who start or stop taking the pill, then, may be in for some relationship problems. A study published last year in Psychological Science found that women paired with MHC-similar men are less sexually satisfied and more likely to cheat on their partners than women paired with MHC-dissimilar men. So a woman on the pill, for example, might be more likely to start dating a MHC-similar man, but he could ultimately leave her less sexually satisfied. Then if she goes off the pill during the relationship, the accompanying hormonal changes will draw her even more strongly toward more MHC-dissimilar men. These immune genes may have a “powerful effect in terms of how well relationships are cemented,” says University of Liverpool psychologist Craig Roberts, co-author of the August paper.
Transhumanisum, Posthumanisum and Homo-perfectus
The inhabitants of planet earth represent many species of living creatures but, mankind is the only one that can destroy it all through explosion or implosion. We’re all quite aware of the threat of nuclear annihilation but the threat of “coming apart” at the seams can escape recognition as another and just as valid impending doom.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) combined with the methods behind techno-progressive pedagogy are redefining what will appear to be human in the future. There is no doubt about this, as the love of biological experimentalism has advanced to the embryonic segregation in a petri dish of DNA that shall produce refined humans, specifically with a higher intelligence quotient (IQ). The breeding of the future human-being will no doubt result in raising the bar for human intellectual capacity in problem solving but, does this somehow transfer into making the human race better or worse overall?
DEFINITION; “the belief or theory that the human race can evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations, especially by means of science and technology”
There is an intellectual movement that makes claim to the assertion the if the human IQ could ascend to greater heights then all of our problems could be solved and we could reach our fullest potential as Homo-perfectus.
Of course this notion is being called a theroy but, in actuality it is well in play. If one chooses to peal back the layers of obscurity and gain a clearer view of today’s practices, it becomes self evident that social engineering is hard at work in virtually every sector of our society./h5>
Writing with the Veiled…